Was Conscription Necessary In Ww1 Essay


     
 

Canadahistory.com

 

Canadahistory.com

     

Prehistory |2 Worlds Meet | New France | England Arrives | Clash of Empires | Revolution | British America |Reform/Revolt| Responsible Government | Confederation |Nation Building | Laurier | The Great War | Roaring 20's | Great Depression | WWII | The Peace | Cold War | Trudeau | PC's in Power | Modern Canada

European Tensions | War | Mobilization | Poland - France | Battle of Britain | Dieppe | Battle of the North Atlantic | Training the Empire | The Pacific | Quebec Conference | Hong Kong | Home Front | Italy | Conscription | Normandy | France | Netherlands | Germany

Even before the storm clouds were gathering over Europe, Mackenzie King was apprehensive about any foreign events that might drag Canada into a conflict which might require the commitment of large land forces. He was particularly sensitive to the Conscription Crisis and its results form the First World War. On his visit to Britain and Germany in 1937 he was particularly attentive  to diplomatic judgments and actions that would calm the European situation and minimize the potential of another great war.

By 1939 when war began to look possible and then after the signing of the Nazi/Soviet pact in August, King was still determined to avoid sending a land force to any war in which it might become involved but to build up the Canadian air force and navy in order to be able to restrict the number of soldiers needed and hence the possibility of having to resort to conscription to fill those numbers. The members of his cabinet from Quebec made it completely clear to him that if he was to bring conscription in, they would have to leave the cabinet and the government might then fall.

During the stunning days of September, as Poland fell, King realized that Canada would have to make a land force contribution and it was decided to send the 1st Division to England as a start. The Liberal government promised that it would not introduce conscription as a way of filling the ranks of the quickly expanding army and hoped to settle fears in Quebec that it was coming regardless of speeches.

By June, the Germans had again devastated several more allies and countries as the lowlands and France all toppled under the relentless attack of the German Blitzkrieg. The outcry from the country to do more to support Britain was overwhelming and in order to avoid conscription but draw manpower into the military and support services the National Resources Mobilization Act was introduced in Parliament and passed on June 21, 1940. This act allow the Liberals to show that they were taking action by drafting any able bodies man into home service to support the war effort and appease the anti- conscriptionists by avoiding conscription which would send Canadians overseas that did not want to go.Registration for the NRMA occurred with little resistance.

By 1942 the pressure to bring conscription in and make the war effort total was again rising and King faced a rebellion from his English Cabinet Ministers over the issue. King presented the idea of holding a plebiscite which would release the Liberals from their commitment not to bring in conscription. On April 17th, 1942 Bill 80 was passed although the vote for conscription was over 80% in English Canada and over 70% against conscription in Quebec. The wording of the bill authorized conscription for overseas service if it was deemed necessary.

 

By 1944 the military personnel that had been conscripted and not sent overseas were known as Zombies and the high casualty rates seemed to indicate that they would need to be used for overseas duty. On November 22, King gave into the pressures from his government and decided to start sending the conscripts overseas as replacements. He saved his government and although only just over 12,000 conscripts arrived in combat areas by the end of the war, the outcry form Quebec and anti-conscriptionist remained relatively quite compared to WWI. King had successfully navigated the competing demands of politic, economic, military and international demands and survived the war with a strong Liberal party and victory in the war.



Military Draft No longer Necessary Essay

1745 Words7 Pages

Military Draft No Longer Necessary
Over forty years has passed since the United States inducted the last draftee through the Selective Service System. The Selective Service System is an independent agency of the United States, which gives the President the right or power to conscript men for military service. There have been different Acts passed by congress since 1917 that require men of various ages to register for service. Although, the name of each Act and the age requirements of the registries changed, the Acts were all similar in nature. They all gave the President the right to call men to war when he deemed necessary. In January 1973, Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird announced the creation of the all-volunteer service, retracting…show more content…

Since the conscription ended in 1973, the number of members has grown considerably over the years. Men and women alike enlist for many different reasons; from educational purposes, for the adventure, and/or other benefits the military has to offer. Many enlist just because they want to defend and serve the country they live in and no other reason. However, all that do enlist want to be there doing what they are doing, not because someone told them they have to. The armed forces haven’t had any problems recruiting, and are recruiting more than their goal. According to the Department of Defense, they are recruiting anywhere from 100 to 105% of their goal each year.
Which leads to another reason we should not reinstate the draft, the draft is not needed because the all-volunteer forces have been successful in serving our country for over 40 years-through both war and peace. Melvin Laird, Secretary of Defense (1969-1973), stated in his article in the Washington Post this past February that “our volunteer forces have surpassed expectations and they have been successful by every measure” (Wahingtonpost.com). For more than a decade, the U.S. military has been able to sustain combat in Iraq and Afghanistan while meeting other global responsibilities. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that “the current volunteer force is the most capable in the nation’s history” (GAO.gov). They found

Show More

0 thoughts on “Was Conscription Necessary In Ww1 Essay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *